very informative
A few years ago, a church decided to have a circus perform during one of their services. The sad part isn't so much that this happened, but that far too much of the church has become a circus in its own right.
This book gives the reader a good view of one aspect of the unfunny circus that is the church today, with numerous examples of the unbiblical things taught by those who call themselves apostles and prophets, the inaccurate prophecies the so-called prophets have given, and the ways these people who call themselves apostles and prophets try to cover up their bad teachings and keep anyone from keeping them accountable.
This is a very important and informative book. Far too many people in the church today are being deceived, and books like this are there to help people see the deceptions. I highly recommend it.
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
book review—Rise of the Fallen by Chuck Black
interesting, but not
completely buying what he's teaching
Blogging for Books
provided this book to me for free in exchange for an honest review.
I'll deal with this book
like I did the first, as a story as regarding it's theology.
Story—First, don't
come into this book expecting a typical sequel to the first book in
the series. I give the author some credit for doing something a bit
different, perhaps even risky. And I'll give him more credit for
doing it fairly well, story-wise.
A lot happens in this
story, and it held my interest. The main character gets developed
pretty well, as the reader sees him in various historical and
modern-day situations.
Theology—This is a bit
tricky, because the author adds some speculative things that, if read
wrongly, could come off as theological. To that end, the Reader's
Guide was helpful for understanding what the author inserted on his
own.
On the good side, the
story focused on faith in Christ. Even for a “good” man like
Drew, the main hero of the first story who appears in this one too,
there is no salvation apart from faith in Christ, no matter what good
works he's trying to do. Along with there, there are things
concerning abortion and sexuality that are biblically sound.
The author does engage
in the kind of ego-boosting us-center rhetoric that is all too common
today. “God sees the potential in all of us...”, he writes in the
Reader's Guide. But biblically, we know that “none are righteous”
and “all our works of righteousness are as filthy rags”.
If there is one thing
that honked me off a little theologically, it's when he tries to
throw in the need to “hear God's whispers”. Even the angels in
this story have to try to hear them, for some reason. I realize this
is a popular teaching, but I've yet to come on anyone who can truly
show me where the Bible tells us that God speaks to us via a quiet
inner voice. And this author doesn't give any biblical support for
the notion, either.
Conclusion—It's an
interesting read. I wish I could be a little more enthusiastic in my
support for it, but I simply can't ignore some of the things the
story teaches that are a bit off, like the God-whispers stuff. But
there is enough good that I'd give a recommendation.
Sunday, February 1, 2015
book review--Divine Applause by Jeff Anderson
say hello to the new
legalism
Blogging for Books provided this book to me for free in exchange for an honest review.
Much of the rest of the book is along those same lines, basically him taking a few biblical passages and making stuff up about them, trying to read between the lines, so to speak. Gideon had only a few hundred people to fight with because he asked God a few times to verify what He'd said to him? That's not taught in the Bible. All the backstory about Abraham's unnamed servant sent to find a wife for Isaac? None of that is in the Bible. This author is far more interested in his own vain imaginations then in teaching sound bibilical theology
“When even good, holy, and proper things become confused with the gospel, it is only a matter of time before we end up with Christless Christianity: a story about us instead of a story about the Triune God that sweeps us into the unfolding drama.” Michael Horton. Christless Christianity: The Alternative Gospel of the American Church (p. 109). Anderson tries to deal with good, holy, and proper things—giving is good, prayer is good, fasting is good. But he does so in a way that makes the story about me. “What did Jesus mean when He told the adulterous woman to “go, and sin no more” (John 8:11 KJV). He must have believed in something greater for her life. And when He preached to the crowds, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Matthew 5:48), He had something greater in mind for them too.”
In the end, this book is simply another in a sad and sadly growing collection of ego-boosting works of me-centered theology. God is there to make my life an adventure, give meaning to my life, make me a superstar, but I have do everything right so that God can do that for me. God is relegated to being a supporting player in the grand and glorious story of me. Few things could be less Christian.
Blogging for Books provided this book to me for free in exchange for an honest review.
I suppose a lot of
people are familiar with the old legalism, the “Christians don't
drink or chew, and don't hang out with folks who do” type. This
kind of legalism was grim and dour, looking askance upon fun and
entertainment. Rock music was evil, movies were evil, dancing was
evil, TV was the devil's tool box, and so on.
The new legalism is
different. It comes with a smile, offering all kinds of good things.
The god of the new legalism isn't looking to strike you down if you
slip up; rather, he's just eager and waiting to drop all kinds of
blessings on you if you'll just get your act together. That's the god
of Divine Applause.
The god that Anderson
writes about in this book is a god whose attention you have to get,
and Anderson tells you how. If you give money, God notices. If you
fast, God starts paying attention. If you pray, God's ears perk up.
But though the new
legalism wears a very different face from the old one, it is still
legalism. How much should you give? Well, maybe tithing isn't enough
for you to get God's attention. “Honest study suggests there is no
biblical giving measurement that applies to everyone. In fact, it's
possible that your 10 percent, or even beyond, may not please
God...We learn from Jesus's applause of the generous widow at the
Temple that God measures our gifts according to how much our gift
costs us. He measures it according to our unique sacrifice.” So,
how do you know if you giving is pleasing to God? “If your decision
to give 5 percent of you income (or 1 percent or even one dollar)
causes your heart to beat faster and your hands to sweat, then that
healthy tension can make your gift matter both to you and to God.”
Of course, he doesn't show where racing hearts and sweating palms are
taught in the Bible as a basis for giving.
Much of the rest of the book is along those same lines, basically him taking a few biblical passages and making stuff up about them, trying to read between the lines, so to speak. Gideon had only a few hundred people to fight with because he asked God a few times to verify what He'd said to him? That's not taught in the Bible. All the backstory about Abraham's unnamed servant sent to find a wife for Isaac? None of that is in the Bible. This author is far more interested in his own vain imaginations then in teaching sound bibilical theology
“When even good, holy, and proper things become confused with the gospel, it is only a matter of time before we end up with Christless Christianity: a story about us instead of a story about the Triune God that sweeps us into the unfolding drama.” Michael Horton. Christless Christianity: The Alternative Gospel of the American Church (p. 109). Anderson tries to deal with good, holy, and proper things—giving is good, prayer is good, fasting is good. But he does so in a way that makes the story about me. “What did Jesus mean when He told the adulterous woman to “go, and sin no more” (John 8:11 KJV). He must have believed in something greater for her life. And when He preached to the crowds, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Matthew 5:48), He had something greater in mind for them too.”
But the adulterous woman
could no more keep from sinning than she could keep from breathing,
perhaps even less so. The people who heard Jesus say that weren't
suppose to think that they could be perfect by their own efforts—many
of them were already trying to do that by their own efforts, by
keeping the law, by living in legalism. The law isn't meant to
inspire us to a form of bootstrap theology, but to help us see how
sinful our sins are.
Romans 3“21 But now
the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law,
although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the
righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who
believe. For there is no distinction: 23for all have sinned and fall
short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a
gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put
forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This
was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he
had passed over n former sins. 26 It was to show his
righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the
justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” One of the big things
the law is suppose to do is show us how much we need the Gospel of
Christ dying for our sins, to show us how lost we are without
Christ's sacrifice.
In the end, this book is simply another in a sad and sadly growing collection of ego-boosting works of me-centered theology. God is there to make my life an adventure, give meaning to my life, make me a superstar, but I have do everything right so that God can do that for me. God is relegated to being a supporting player in the grand and glorious story of me. Few things could be less Christian.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)