somewhat dull, scripturally suspect
I received a free copy of this book through the Destiny Image Book Review
program.
First, I didn't really find this book all that interesting,
though much of that may be my own fault. Gemstones are simply not a big interest
of mine, they aren't something I put a lot of study into. No doubt it's a
fascinating field, and certainly gemstones can be quite nice to look at, but
it's simply something I'm not well informed on.
When she says early in
the book "Though some question to which modern-day gemstone varieties the
apostle John was referring in his vision (and how they correlate to the stones
assigned to the 12 tribes of Israel), it is interesting to explore how one might
interpret suggested symbolisms in relation to our Christian walk." (pp. 13-14),
I find myself wondering why her take on these things should be taken as been all
that authoritative. Why, for example, should X stone by made to represent Y
tribe? Are their plain biblical texts that say that this stone was meant to
represent that tribe? There simply doesn't seem to be anyplace where that is
plainly said, which means that a lot of what she teaches is rather
speculative.
Then, there's this comment. "In studying God's Word, it is
important to remember that there are many different facets and levels of
learning that each of us can achieve while growing in intimacy with our Lord."
(p. 18). Through the book, she makes it seem as if these gemstones represent
levels we can advance to and through. Now, where does the Bible say that this is
what these stones represent? I did not see where she showed that from the Bible,
so why should I accept her premise that there are such levels?
She ends
most of her chapters with a prayer she wants the reader to pray. One aspect of
most or all of these prayers is the standard charismatic rebukes of demonic
spirits who are suppose to be keeping people down. Where does the Bible tell us
to do that kind of thing?
More questionable then that, right after these
prayers she gives a brief paragraph that she calls "The Lord's Word to You",
which is phrased as if it is God speaking to the reader. Is she really claiming
that these words really are from God? Should we take them as seriously as the
Bible? What about people who read the book who aren't believers in Christ, or
who don't agree with what she's saying?
I think some things she teaches
in this book should be seriously questioned. I'm not satisfied that she has made
a good biblical case for what she's wanting us to do and believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment