Showing posts with label dilbert. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dilbert. Show all posts

Saturday, June 12, 2010

down the rabbit hole

Perhaps I'll start looking into how the whole Postmodern movement was inspired by Powerpoint, even before Powerpoint was invented. Maybe I'll use Caputo-ese, talking about how the event of Powerpoint brought about Postmodernism, permeating all thought and actions leading that made for the birth of Postmodernism, and how the fact that we now have Powerpoint only means that not all of Caputo's nonevent events actually remain nonevents.

I'll probably need Wally to help me with that.

Dilbert.com

And remember, when Powerpoint crashes, Postmodernism dies.

Monday, November 3, 2008

can you spare us a change (please)???

A comic that works on so many levels

Dilbert.com

In both the religious and political spheres, it would be good if people considered that 'change' is nothing in itself. Simply because something is 'different' doesn't mean it's 'good', or even 'better' than what is here and now.

Monday, September 1, 2008

example of pomo 'love'

Yes, I am a Dilbert fan. That's why I've linked to a few before this one.

Seriously, though, read this comic, and tell me that it doesn't sum up the whole pomo virus idea of 'love' and 'compassion' to a tee.

Dilbert.com

Thursday, August 28, 2008

making the simple sickeningly impenetrable

This comic works for the current postmodern virus on so many levels...

Dilbert.com

In reading pomos recently, I'm struck by how far they will go to take what is simple and make it into impenetrable blather. See Caputo's take on the Cross below here for an example, and Raschke's death of God thoughts, though those are rather clear compared to other things they and those like them have written.

One does after a while get that sour taste.

And, finally, as so well put in McLaren's "A New Kind of Christian", since we don't know what postmodernism is or where it's going, we'll probably need to live quite long before they finally decide whatever it is they are (all the while having to deal with them in the here and now). Though I doubt anyone, even they themselves, buy into such a patient view of things.